Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Kay's avatar

I find it interesting that in the twilight of Abrahamism the notion that directs a functioning morality is rejected. I write this with the full awareness that Abrahamism arose as a thief and competitor, and owed its ascendency to temporal forces.

The purpose of a working morality is to allow the florescence of the person, and we must admit, if we are honest, that almost all of the spiritual life of the ancestors is not included in the record. We have only the broken testimony of Runestones and talismans to jog our memories, and perhaps a few accounts by enemies who recorded such for their own purposes.

This is not written as an indictment or a criticism, it is merely an observation that for certain ancient customs to be important, such as marriage and the function of the caste system, loyalty and love, there was of necessity a form of morality in place.

Magic without morality must I think, answer questions regarding aim and purpose.

A final observation, and one that troubles me, is the gift of Abrahamism that intentionally destroys any place for spirituality.

Just to be clear, I am not critiquing your work. These are merely the honest responses i find that arise from reading this worthy post.

Ausiàs Tsel's avatar

"A wound reveals structure" could sit as an epigraph over most of what I write. I just published a piece about a Roman torturer who prepares a floor of broken pottery with the care of a tiler; the craft of wounding as diagnostic, not spectacle. Your wound-world frame gives it a name I hadn't found. The parallel with Odin's self-inflicted damage as practical engagement rather than martyrdom is particularly sharp. There's a version of Mediterranean Catholicism that understood this too, before it got sanitized.

No posts

Ready for more?